chintu25
08-16 01:42 PM
Feel free to email me or call me
wallpaper Soundtrack - Movie Naruto
Ann Ruben
05-14 04:27 PM
The most important issue is to insure that any USCIS notices come directly to you. If the RFE was sent to your address, that is a good sign. Technically, the G-28 is only for your legal representative, though sending one in as advised above would do no harm. You might also, or instead, send a letter signed by you and your wife advising that you are no longer represented and asking that all future correspondence be addressed to your home. I would then follow up with the National Customer Service Center to make sure they have correct information.
Saralayar
03-18 12:07 PM
Today i saw Soft LUD on my approved I-140. Is anybody else got same thing?
I also got one on 03/13/08 on my approved I-140.
I also got one on 03/13/08 on my approved I-140.
2011 Screenshot 49
dano
05-04 04:57 PM
Can anybody recommend a good attorney in the DC metro area, I am trying to start the GC process and as I understand the LC (EB3 ROW) portion is very important and challenging currently.
I've heard of Murthy Law Firm and some other big name (in DC).
I've also looked at Ryan & Taylor based in Reisterstown, MD (same as Murthy).
thanks for your help!
-dan
I've heard of Murthy Law Firm and some other big name (in DC).
I've also looked at Ryan & Taylor based in Reisterstown, MD (same as Murthy).
thanks for your help!
-dan
more...
GCHope2011
07-10 03:54 PM
If you are questioned on educational equivalence of the 3+2 year degree's parity with US' 4+2 year bachelor + masters, and your education evaluator can make a strong case for it, you should be ok.
Ramba
10-07 05:25 PM
Any suggestion whether to switch attorney after using AC21 and moving to new company?
If you have good relationship/communication with your previous attorney, it is not recomended to change, as it is a additional work for uscis, that they may not like it. The new G-28 may not properly attached, uscis may not update the information ect may cuase you unrest. As long as possible, avoid contact with uscis, unless they asked to do as they are heavily backlogged with all application.
If you have good relationship/communication with your previous attorney, it is not recomended to change, as it is a additional work for uscis, that they may not like it. The new G-28 may not properly attached, uscis may not update the information ect may cuase you unrest. As long as possible, avoid contact with uscis, unless they asked to do as they are heavily backlogged with all application.
more...
sku
12-26 05:52 PM
^^^Bump^^^
2010 Plot Summary: Naruto Shippuden
sve0390
08-03 06:07 PM
Hi,
My NIW/I-140 application has been pending for a year. During this time, I have more qualifications added to my resume. Is there a mechanism to send my updated resume or should I just let it be?
Thanks.
They asked me to send additional evidence in support of my NIW petition. I'd say just wait for them to ask you anything that they require to justify NIW.
My NIW/I-140 application has been pending for a year. During this time, I have more qualifications added to my resume. Is there a mechanism to send my updated resume or should I just let it be?
Thanks.
They asked me to send additional evidence in support of my NIW petition. I'd say just wait for them to ask you anything that they require to justify NIW.
more...
neeidd
07-15 12:20 PM
I have nov 2004 PD. I have the same problem. USCIS received my app on aug 3rd. But notice date is oct 11. From , i see that these dates doesnt matter as long as your PD is current. So, i didnt bother to contact USCIS.
Thanks for the response, leoindiano
Regards
Thanks for the response, leoindiano
Regards
hair images Haku: Naruto Shippuden
sammyb
04-15 05:20 PM
What was your own LC PD? Nothing personal just out of curiosity...
LC Sub/EB2 with PD June 2001 filed on July 27 with RD of Sept 8 got approved y'day. 140 filed on July 5th was approved on jan. no RFE, all were smooth.
I was afraid because of my last years on L1B and filed H1b though this year quota and not sure if i'm lucky to have a number lottery. This gave me major relaxation.
Best of luck you all.
Had 1 Soft LUD on Jan 31 on 485 application.
USCIS is doing a great job thank to IV to make these possible.
LC Sub/EB2 with PD June 2001 filed on July 27 with RD of Sept 8 got approved y'day. 140 filed on July 5th was approved on jan. no RFE, all were smooth.
I was afraid because of my last years on L1B and filed H1b though this year quota and not sure if i'm lucky to have a number lottery. This gave me major relaxation.
Best of luck you all.
Had 1 Soft LUD on Jan 31 on 485 application.
USCIS is doing a great job thank to IV to make these possible.
more...
Blog Feeds
12-18 09:50 AM
As a California immigration lawyer who files many asylum cases, I am used to thinking of a the United States as a place of refuge and to documenting the horrible country conditions of other countries. I have successfully represented applicants for asylum who feared staying in their countries because while serving in their countries' armies, they were harmed on account of their sexual orientation.
It is therefore rather surprising to come across a story of a U.S.soldier who is fleeing to Canada (http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/11/20/refugee-board-soldier-lesbian.html) because she fears harm in the U.S. Army on account of her sexual orientation. According to CBC news, U.S. Army Pte. Bethany Smith fled Canada in September 2007 from a U.S. Army base in Fort Campbell, Ky. She applied for refugee status in October 2007, saying that she was harassed and threatened by fellow soldiers over her sexual orientation and feared that her life would be in danger if she were deported and returned to the army. The Canadian authorities initially rejected in her claim in February 2009. However, on appeal, the Federal Court of Canada held that the refugee board must reconsider the case again because the Board made several mistakes in initially reviewing her claim.
The Federal Court's decision (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/Smith%20and%20the%20Minister%20of%20Citizenship%20 and%20Immigration.pdf)noted that the refugee board failed to fully consider the evidence pertaining to the situation of gays and lesbians in the U.S. Army to determine whether Pte. Smith could have availed herself of protection in the United States. The Federal Court also noted that the Board failed to determine whether Pte. Smith would be persecuted on account of her social group - as a lesbian in the U.S. Army if forced to return. There were other errors mentioned in the decision.
It is sad that the U.S. policy of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," is the basis of an asylum claim in Canada. Pt. Smith was only 19 years old when she fled to Canada. From everything I read, it appears that she wanted to serve in the U.S. Army and no real desire to leave the United States. At a time when we apparently need people to serve in the Armed Forces and in fact give non-citizens a way to immigrate to the United States faster for their service, it seems ridiculous that an American citizen should have to leave. It it is time to eliminate the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy.
More... (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/11/us_army_soldier_applies_for_as.html)
It is therefore rather surprising to come across a story of a U.S.soldier who is fleeing to Canada (http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/11/20/refugee-board-soldier-lesbian.html) because she fears harm in the U.S. Army on account of her sexual orientation. According to CBC news, U.S. Army Pte. Bethany Smith fled Canada in September 2007 from a U.S. Army base in Fort Campbell, Ky. She applied for refugee status in October 2007, saying that she was harassed and threatened by fellow soldiers over her sexual orientation and feared that her life would be in danger if she were deported and returned to the army. The Canadian authorities initially rejected in her claim in February 2009. However, on appeal, the Federal Court of Canada held that the refugee board must reconsider the case again because the Board made several mistakes in initially reviewing her claim.
The Federal Court's decision (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/Smith%20and%20the%20Minister%20of%20Citizenship%20 and%20Immigration.pdf)noted that the refugee board failed to fully consider the evidence pertaining to the situation of gays and lesbians in the U.S. Army to determine whether Pte. Smith could have availed herself of protection in the United States. The Federal Court also noted that the Board failed to determine whether Pte. Smith would be persecuted on account of her social group - as a lesbian in the U.S. Army if forced to return. There were other errors mentioned in the decision.
It is sad that the U.S. policy of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," is the basis of an asylum claim in Canada. Pt. Smith was only 19 years old when she fled to Canada. From everything I read, it appears that she wanted to serve in the U.S. Army and no real desire to leave the United States. At a time when we apparently need people to serve in the Armed Forces and in fact give non-citizens a way to immigrate to the United States faster for their service, it seems ridiculous that an American citizen should have to leave. It it is time to eliminate the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy.
More... (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/11/us_army_soldier_applies_for_as.html)
hot Free Naruto Shippuuden Movies
WaitingYaar
01-09 09:39 AM
Thanks for the info. Any thoughts on under what scenarios they issue request for an interview. And does this means that the case is further delayed, or they randomly pick cases for interview.
more...
house naruto shippuden akatsuki
superdude
07-25 07:01 PM
Gallop Polls are conducted to find out the best guestimate. Alomost every memeber in this thread would ahve started their green card journey. The results you will be getting would be useless, I believe. If you want some realistic data, you should post this message in the General category of Immigration Voice.
tattoo Naruto Shippuden: The Lost
![Naruto Shippuden Volume 49. [ANIME] Naruto Shippuden 209](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgCdsNc_hyphenhyphen9Mr8zDB39iVhOj7uaechqkk_Xwp4cD_qZSvS4IkWZenBqri6IkkWLAKwxbDVw3WxafIYdtPjoF60kEfe7nhQDNbYzbiv17gs6nl0AETKyuyIpbFdKz5hJhIqloh8toA1w2Jc/s1600/364523_1264334812392_full.jpg "[ANIME] Naruto Shippuden 209")
OLDMONK
06-21 07:24 PM
If you are Canadian Citizen (by birth not naturalized) it should be pretty quick, maybe 6-18 months depending on FBI name check timing.
You should get your EAD 10-12 weeks.
I am not sure about one thing. As I know visitor visa doesn't have an immigrant intent, is that a negative or neutral in your instance.
As far as priority dates go Canada has always been current.
All the above I said is based on very little specific input about your case. Let some guru chime in who has been on this path already.
You should get your EAD 10-12 weeks.
I am not sure about one thing. As I know visitor visa doesn't have an immigrant intent, is that a negative or neutral in your instance.
As far as priority dates go Canada has always been current.
All the above I said is based on very little specific input about your case. Let some guru chime in who has been on this path already.
more...
pictures Naruto Shippuden Ultimate
ajay
07-14 01:32 PM
You should be able to work with any company provided they are ready to give you support when USCIS asks for an RFE about your employment status.
Also you have to make sure that your job fall in the same description that you have filed the 485 for.
Consult other informations/resources also.
Also you have to make sure that your job fall in the same description that you have filed the 485 for.
Consult other informations/resources also.
dresses Naruto shippuden: Dragon Blade
Appu
09-16 12:38 PM
There's a very good post here:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/8/29/1091/84205
Everyone on this forum should go read it and comment on it.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/8/29/1091/84205
Everyone on this forum should go read it and comment on it.
more...
makeup Naruto Shippuden: Dragon Sword
samk32@gmail.com
06-11 07:04 PM
My Question is - Am I eligible for Premium I-140 Processing since i am in my 6 th year of Stay.
Here is little background on the same (Technical Error)
I was on L1A from Sep 2003 to Sep 2005
First H1B from Oct 2005 to Sep 2008
In August 2008, I got Second H1 extension till Sep 2011 instead of Sep 2009.
My Labor got approved in this year in March also I got my Visa approved and I-94 Issued till Sep 2011.
My First Question remains the same - Am I elligible for Premium I-140 Processing. After I-140 Processing, should i apply for H1 extension again.
Pls. advice
Here is little background on the same (Technical Error)
I was on L1A from Sep 2003 to Sep 2005
First H1B from Oct 2005 to Sep 2008
In August 2008, I got Second H1 extension till Sep 2011 instead of Sep 2009.
My Labor got approved in this year in March also I got my Visa approved and I-94 Issued till Sep 2011.
My First Question remains the same - Am I elligible for Premium I-140 Processing. After I-140 Processing, should i apply for H1 extension again.
Pls. advice
girlfriend [ANIME] Naruto Shippuden 209
ujayra01
07-18 04:38 PM
Hello Gurus,
My wife is on H4 since 2004 and we filed H1 (Jan. 2007) and her H1 status is pending at this moment. I am about to file 485 (July 2007 current bulletin) very soon.
I have mentioned that she is on H4 in the I485 related docs. I thought her H4 becomes invalid ONLY after H1 is APPROVED. Is this correct? Please let me know.
Thanks for your help.
My wife is on H4 since 2004 and we filed H1 (Jan. 2007) and her H1 status is pending at this moment. I am about to file 485 (July 2007 current bulletin) very soon.
I have mentioned that she is on H4 in the I485 related docs. I thought her H4 becomes invalid ONLY after H1 is APPROVED. Is this correct? Please let me know.
Thanks for your help.
hairstyles Naruto Shippuden The Movie:
eb3_nepa
02-25 06:39 PM
Hi,
A couple of questions on the simaltaneous filing of I-140 and I-485
1) I had read somewhere that USCIS was going to stop the same. Has that happened yet?
2) Say a person has applied for the I-140 but cannot simaltaneously apply for 485 due to retrogression. In the event that the dates become current BUT the I-140 is not yet approved, can the person still file for the 485 under the simultaneous filing or does he have to wait till the I-140 is actually approved?
A couple of questions on the simaltaneous filing of I-140 and I-485
1) I had read somewhere that USCIS was going to stop the same. Has that happened yet?
2) Say a person has applied for the I-140 but cannot simaltaneously apply for 485 due to retrogression. In the event that the dates become current BUT the I-140 is not yet approved, can the person still file for the 485 under the simultaneous filing or does he have to wait till the I-140 is actually approved?
jnraajan
04-11 03:19 PM
USCIS is the US Govt..You do not tell Uncle SAm how to do their job....!!
Actually, that is not true. USCIS is part of US Govt. That is true. But, the department is run exclusively on the funds generated by receipt fees. So, they do have a responsibility towards us. dont you think
Actually, that is not true. USCIS is part of US Govt. That is true. But, the department is run exclusively on the funds generated by receipt fees. So, they do have a responsibility towards us. dont you think
hibworker
02-04 04:54 PM
If the question didn't showed up - then it has been removed. Its as simple as that - isn't it. The question cannot magically show up for some and not for others.
Take it easy! Good luck with your interview.
Take it easy! Good luck with your interview.
